"Why Mac OS X doesn't have portable applications?" Euh ... and what if MacOS X allready has portable apps? That's what it seems reading this article just published by MacWorld:
Your apps in your pocket | Mobile Mac
------------------------------------------------
Imagine carrying the applications you use all the time—a Web browser, an e-mail client, a word processor, and even an image editor—in your pocket, ready to run on any Mac (and in some cases, Windows PCs), with all your preferences and plug-ins just the way you want them. Welcome to the world of portable applications.
Read the article : <http://www.macworld.com/2006/10/secrets/novmobilemac/index.php>
And allso check this webpage:
"OS X Portable Applications"
<http://www.freesmug.org/portableapps/>
by Sir Henry — Nov 07
Your apps in your pocket | Mobile Mac
------------------------------------------------
Imagine carrying the applications you use all the time—a Web browser, an e-mail client, a word processor, and even an image editor—in your pocket, ready to run on any Mac (and in some cases, Windows PCs), with all your preferences and plug-ins just the way you want them. Welcome to the world of portable applications.
Read the article : <http://www.macworld.com/2006/10/secrets/novmobilemac/index.php>
And allso check this webpage:
"OS X Portable Applications"
<http://www.freesmug.org/portableapps/>
Prettige dag ("have a nice day" in Dutch)!
Sir Henry