Those are technologies that died due to lack of developer support
???
Heh heh, that's hilarious. And do you have any explanation as to why these technologies weren't supported enough? Could it be to do with the... technologies themselves perhaps?
Anyways, from a business POV, this argument really seems to boils down to two things:
1) Will Leopard make life so much easier for the developer that he will profit from increased productivity (from tools improvements, gc, only having to tend to one build, etc.)?
2) Will Leopard provide for enough new useful, marketable features that will justify the costs of doing Leopard-only development at this point in time?
by David — Jan 06
???
Heh heh, that's hilarious. And do you have any explanation as to why these technologies weren't supported enough? Could it be to do with the... technologies themselves perhaps?
Anyways, from a business POV, this argument really seems to boils down to two things:
1) Will Leopard make life so much easier for the developer that he will profit from increased productivity (from tools improvements, gc, only having to tend to one build, etc.)?
2) Will Leopard provide for enough new useful, marketable features that will justify the costs of doing Leopard-only development at this point in time?