Initial Impression of Pages

First reaction: very much a Mac OS X app. If you closed your eyes and visualized what a modern word processor by Apple would look like, you have a good idea of what Pages is. Elegant design and consistency within the Mac OS X universe.

The primary difference from Word in terms of output is that Pages has strong layout functionality, in addition to word processing. This a big deal for me because I never could justify buying InDesign. I just sorta made do with Illustrator. Nor did I want switch back and forth between a layout app and a word processing app.

Much like Keynote, the most important tools are easily accessible, and I'm not bogged down by a whole bunch of UI that doesn't apply to my task. If you like the Keynote philosophy, Pages will just feel right.



For me, the most important design decision Apple made was to not clone Word. Not only is this not the type of product I'd want, it would put Apple in the position of constantly playing catch-up.

The export to PDF works beatifully. Though in the test I ran, the HTML output doesn't seem to reflect the document layout at all. All the text is there, but the object placement is much different. Maybe there is some tweaking to do, not sure.

A template in Pages is a meta-template of sorts. You can choose a specific template for each page in your document, or you can just keep typing forever and get a new default page each time you reach the end of the current one (as in Word). Table of contents can be generated automatically, and there's easy access to styles, lists, margins and the like.

Like Keynote, only took about an hour of messing around to figure out how the app works. Though it does come with a half-size user's guide. There's some interesting psychology behind the miniature guide, as it seems less intimidating and, thus, more likely to be read.

Apple hit the nail right on the head with this. Pages provides a human-centric approach to document creation. Exactly what I've been looking for.
Design Element
Initial Impression of Pages
Posted Jan 22, 2005 — 5 comments below




 

Mark Davis — Jan 22, 05 67

Sounds like I'll enjoy using Pages. I've ordered my copy of iWork but it'll probably take a bit longer to ship up to Canada.

Larry Sica — Jan 22, 05 70

I got this yesterday. I agree it is definitely not Word, which I like. So far it seems OK. A few quirks but nothing show stopping for me.

I've commented before, but it strikingly does not feel like Word. It's much cleaner and more elegant. I do wish I could insert things like Omni files into it. I does not seem to let me.

Scott Stevenson — Jan 23, 05 71 Scotty the Leopard

OmniGraffle? Just export as PDF and place in a Pages document.

Lemont Washington — Mar 10, 05 111

You can also just select your items in Omnigraffle and copy it to the pasteboard. It will still use pdf representation when you paste it within pages. Works like a charm. It would be nice if Apple did a good implementation of some kind of Object Linking and Embedding , but that would get hairy as Microsoft has proven with active-x and com.

Jos Antonio Ortega — Mar 28, 05 120

Lemmont, just in case you didn't know:

LinkBack (http://www.linkbackproject.org/) already provides that functionality for Keynote... I guess Pages will be the next one.




 

Comments Temporarily Disabled

I had to temporarily disable comments due to spam. I'll re-enable them soon.





Copyright © Scott Stevenson 2004-2015