iMac Core 2 Duo Review

Simply the best consumer computer Apple has ever made. From what I've seen, I don't think you can go wrong with this machine. It's the purest expression of the Mac mindset. If you need more details, read on.

I'm not sure what sort of words to use for this review. This the first iMac I've owned, so everything is new. The big changes this time around are the 64-bit Core 2 Duo chip and the higher-quality display.

These machines are fast. I went with the 20 inch model. I'm used to apps launching instantly on the MacBook Pro, but the boot speed is ludicrous on the iMac. It takes just a few seconds from when I press the power button until I'm looking at the login panel. That's just booting. Everything is responsive and fluid. I'm sure there are benchmarks around, but the point is that it feels fast.

The screen is gorgeous. From what I've seen, the 20 inch screen is not just bigger than the 17 inch, it's actually a much nicer picture. Don't choose one without seeing them in person.

Existing Stuff, Refined

The sound system is impressive, particularly given that it's essentially invisible. The speakers are mounted below the display and pointed down, but you still get clarity and a good bit of bass.

It's not news that the iMac is elegant. The cables are routed behind the stand to give the impression of a floating white rectangle. In many cases you'll only need power and USB, anyway.

The hidden speakers give a sense of the sound magically emanating from the display. Subtle and very pleasing. The effect is even more pronounced  when Front Row is activated.

Bottom Line

I'm not sure what else needs to be said. There's no one thing about the iMac, it's how neatly everything comes together. An understated design, silent operation, dual-core 64-bit chip, gorgeous display, built-in camera and a remote control for media.

We already know it runs Mac OS X, which that offers both mainstream apps and geeky unix stuff. We also know Front Row makes an excellent media experience and that it's an Intel-based machine so it can run Windows. The iMac is the pinnacle of unobtrusive power.

The only thing that makes it sweeter is the price. The iMac bests the experience of any other computer on the market, and does so at a price that meets or beats the other options.

Gushing? Yes. It's justified.

Why Not a Laptop?

If you're looking to buy a Mac, the one other dangling question is whether to go with a laptop or a desktop. Laptops have hooked the mainstream consciousness, but that's not the whole story. For me, there's no one reason for a desktop. It's a few different factors.

First, there's the display issue. For $1500 I can get an iMac with a 20 inch display. I'd have to spent $2800 to get a MacBook Pro with a 17 inch display. And although the MacBook Pro displays are very nice, they're not as nice as the ones built into the 20 inch iMacs. The difference doesn't matter for web browsing, iTunes, and email, but it does matter for design work.

I could, of course, plug in an external display to a cheaper MacBook Pro, but it's still at least $500 more to get comparable power in portable form, not including the price of a secondary display. Plus, I immediately end up with more clutter than the all-in-one design.

Then there's the issue of whether you want to tote around your main machine everywhere you go, exposing it to the entire world. You can leave it on your desk, but then why pay extra?

A MacBook Pro has a clear footprint advantage over a Mac Pro tower, but the gap is much, much smaller beside the iMac. I think the iMac is the best blend of power, price and reduced size. The only reason to go with a laptop is if you truly need the portability.
Design Element
iMac Core 2 Duo Review
Posted Sep 15, 2006 — 21 comments below




 

Preston — Sep 16, 06 1802

I love my 20-inch Core Duo iMac. Welcome to the club. :)

adb — Sep 16, 06 1803

You are making my pre-iSight iMac G5 here cry. Way to go.

I love my 20" iMac G5, but it feels a bit big for me (in a relatively small dorm room).

Kevin Marsh — Sep 16, 06 1804

My 20" Core Duo (1) iMac was the first iMac I've owned, and it has been flawless. I don't think Apple gets enough credit for these machines.

In what is essentially the same form factor as the MacBook Pro, the iMac Engineers somehow subverted all the thermal issues experienced by the portables.

It's quiet, fast, and the 20" screen is gorgeous. I love it so much I have to get the 24" version. In fact, I'm heading to the Apple Store in Novi tomorrow to pick one up.

ssp — Sep 16, 06 1805

To be honest, I think the previous iMac will do just as well. The differences to the new ones just seem to be technical. They're both fast, pretty and have a huge screen and make you sigh when you have to plug in USB devices (both because the ports are hard to reach and because wired USB devices spoil the overall prettiness). And who cares for 64bit anyway? Consumers?

All this ist just based on my experiences with a friend's iMac. I'm still into portable computers. Even if I don't strictly _need_ a computer to carry around, I _like_ having my work environment, addresses and all with me everywhere, I _like_ having not use Linux at the office or Windows when visiting a friend, I _like_ catching up with my e-mail while on a long train ride. (Did you get rid of your MacBook Pro? Only that would make your argument against portability convincing.)

And that's what drives the decisions. If you start doing price comparisons, you could also compare a MacBook (Amateur) plus a large screen against the iMac and the price difference will be less significant. So it's not primarily about money but more a pretty single screen vs. portability tradeoff.

Cacao DC — Sep 16, 06 1806

I like the screens of iMac soooo much, but I just can't sacrifice portability. I don't strictly need a laptop, but I'm so into these things since I dropped desktop computers, that I just don't imagine me using a computer which I can't take with me :)

John Truong — Sep 16, 06 1807

I love my 17" G5 iMac, but I look at the newer ones with a significant amount of yearning. I'll wait until 64-bit Leopard comes out. If it feels slow, I might try to figure out a way of justifying a new Mac to the wife.

Matt Tavares — Sep 16, 06 1808

I just bought mine yesterday, and i think you know their is something incredibly wrong when azureus loads in 2 seconds.

James Cunningham — Sep 16, 06 1809

I'm going to have to agree with ssp: portability is of paramount importance to my computing habits. I like having my primary machine with me when I go on vacations, visit friends, or - hell - am on the couch half-watching a television show.

I bought my first Mac in the Spring: a G4 Mac Mini. I regret the purchase, now, because if I'd just splurged a bit to buy notebook I wouldn't have to go all over campus finding a display with peripherals to use the machine with all of my work and play on it.

It suppose it's another issue if you're able to afford both a decent notebook and a decent desktop, and have a good way to keep information synced between them. But those don't apply to me. At this point I don't see myself ever again buying a desktop to use as my primary machine.

Bob — Sep 16, 06 1810

You can get a 20" 2.16 GHz iMac w/SuperDrive for $1500.

Or, you could get a 13" 2 GHz MacBook w/SuperDrive for $1300 and then buy a 20" LCD for $300. Total price is $1600 and you get a portable machine plus a lot of screen real-estate (20" + 13") when it's on your desk. Of course, you get less RAM, a smaller HD, lame speakers and probably slower graphics (which you probably only care about if you play 3D games). But you gain portability.

That's the choice I made (except I've got a 12" PowerBook). I bought a monitor with a long enough neck that the bottom of the monitor is above the top of the PowerBook's screen so I've got the benefit of two monitors without using horizontal desk space.

Scott Stevenson — Sep 16, 06 1811 Scotty the Leopard

ssp said:

And who cares for 64bit anyway? Consumers?

It will matter for everyone pretty soon, and not just for addressing very large amounts of memory.

Did you get rid of your MacBook Pro? Only that would make your argument against portability convincing.

No, I'm keeping the MacBook Pro. A portable is invaluable if you do any sort of consulting work. The point is that I don't think I can make the portable my main computer. Even if it wasn't for the idea of exposing it to the elements, I just don't think it's the right screen for design work.

Bob said:

But you gain portability.

Which is important if you actually use the portability. I have a gut feeling many people get a laptop just because it's smaller or because they think they're going use the portability. Some do take it over to the couch, but that's about it.

Preston — Sep 16, 06 1812

It will matter for everyone pretty soon, and not just for addressing very large amounts of memory.

I'm not entirely convinced of this yet.  I don't believe there's any registerable demand on the consumer side for 64-bit, not until 4GB of RAM becomes a limitation, and we're not at that point yet.  That said, the 64-bit transition marches on, regardless, and I'll eventually upgrade (I'm waiting until Intel's Santa Rosa platform before grabbing a Core 2 Mac).

Oskar Lissheim-Boethius — Sep 17, 06 1813

It will matter for everyone pretty soon, and not just for addressing very large amounts of memory.

I'm not entirely convinced of this yet.


You forget that Mr. Stevenson attended the WWDC last August. I wonder if he might not have learned something about the 64-bit addition there that we don't know about yet ;)

Ross Carter — Sep 17, 06 1814

Scott, what's the noise level on the new iMac? Do you hear the hard drive at all? Fans?

Chris Ryan — Sep 17, 06 1815

I like my MacBook Pro in general, but the performance leaves a lot to be desired. Apps certainly don't, and never have, launched anywhere near "instantly." I'd almost go so far to say that my 1.5GHz PowerBook outperforms it in many areas.

Scott Stevenson — Sep 17, 06 1818 Scotty the Leopard

Ross Carter:
Scott, what's the noise level on the new iMac? Do you hear the hard drive at all? Fans?

In a perfectly quiet room you can hear the fans a bit.

Chris Ryan:
Apps certainly don't, and never have, launched anywhere near "instantly." I'd almost go so far to say that my 1.5GHz PowerBook outperforms it in many areas.

That's not at all normal. Take a look at this, for example.

Steve-o — Sep 18, 06 1819

Chris Ryan - Something's choking your system. My MBP blows the pants off my Dual G5 PowerMac. There's no way a Powerbook should be faster than a MBP, unless something is draining your system's processor.

Chris Ryan — Sep 20, 06 1831

Something's choking your system. My MBP blows the pants off my Dual G5 PowerMac. There's no way a Powerbook should be faster than a MBP, unless something is draining your system's processor.

But ... what? Activity Viewer and top don't provide any answers. I get delays (e.g. sometimes the Finder takes seconds to respond), spinning rainbows, etc.

filipp — Sep 20, 06 1833

I have a 12" PowerBook G4 with a 20" Cinema Display. I agree that the flatpanel iMacs, especially the 20" are gorgeous and a great value however I think I'll be getting a Mac mini (since I already have the screen), but only when they upgrade the GPU to support Final Cut Studio.

Scott Stevenson — Sep 20, 06 1834 Scotty the Leopard

a Mac mini (since I already have the screen), but only when they upgrade the GPU to support Final Cut Studio.

I don't think the mini is a particularly good final cut pro machine because of the slower hard drive.

suBi — Dec 19, 06 2749

i just got a core 2 duo 20" after thinking over for a month and i just love it... the display is awesome ... the screen is awesome.. everything looks just perfect.... the boot time is great..... compared to a pc .... this is just great... i just wish ppl at apple could integrate media reader slot in an imac... or its notebooks.... everything else is just gr8... i wouldn't care if it never had HD support or even TV tuners and stuff... cause .... i use it for work.. and the only thing i find missing right now is a media card reader.. everything else is PEEEEERFECT...

Steve Sant — Dec 25, 06 2872

Well, I recently made the switch from PC, and got a macbook with 2Gb and have been really impressed...

However, for design work I am waiting until the iMac supports 4Gb of RAM before I get one... I hear the Santa Rosa chipset with be introduced in 2007, so hopefully it will show up in the iMacs pretty soon... In my view, this is the only thing holding back many designers from buying an iMac...

It's pretty obvious that within 24 months, that Photoshop CS3 work is going to need 4Gb....

Steve




 

Comments Temporarily Disabled

I had to temporarily disable comments due to spam. I'll re-enable them soon.





Copyright © Scott Stevenson 2004-2015